Show MoreShould celebrities have their right to privacy? Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about celebrities. Today, however we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear from magazines such as People, Entertainment Weekly, and Star. Also, most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life. However, some people are just obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their children’s rights to privacy. They are…show more content…
The article “The Right to Privacy” became the foundation of privacy tort law in America. For example, there are laws in some states that bar the press from recording private conversations and then the police began wiretapping telephones (“At Issue: Privacy and the Press”). Beginning in 1905, the Georgia Supreme Court in Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Company became the first court to recognize that a common law right of privacy exists in the state. That has used an unauthorized photograph of the plaintiff Paolo Pavesich and attributed statements to him that he did not make. In 1920 The American Civil Liberties Union is dedicated to protecting First Amendment rights and rights to equal protection under the law, due process, and privacy. The European Convention on Human Rights states that all people have a “right to respect for private and family life, his home and his correspondence in 1950. Also on December 18, 1967, the U.S Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S ruled that wiretaps must have court approval, even in places open to the public, such as a public telephone booth (Right of Privacy Timeline).
Next, Congress passes the Privacy Act of 1974 to protect the privacy of citizens by limiting the government’s authority to collect information. Privacy Journal, a monthly newsletter devoted exclusively to news about privacy, is founded and also the People Magazine is launched. February 22, 1977 acknowledged at least two types of interests regarding privacy:
Celebrities' Rights To Privacy Essay
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
The term paparazzi is defined as a freelance photographer, usually one who takes candid pictures of celebrities for publication. The term originated from the surname of the 1959 Federico film, La Dolce Vita. Now, the connotation that arises from the word “paparazzi” is much stronger than just a freelance photographer. The paparazzi are annoying, persistent photographers who, in essence, stalk their celebrity victims and go to any length necessary to get the photograph they desire. But, the paparazzi are doing their job to please the public. Paparazzi tend to target celebrities that fascinate the public; the public’s obsession encourages the paparazzi in their pursuit. The public never calls out the paparazzi for invading the celebrities’ privacy; they only call them out when harm or threats come to the celebrity (Nordhaus 286).
When living their day-to-day lives in the public eye, many celebrities must deal with gossip columnists, the infatuation of stalkers, and the unrelenting paparazzi. They follow celebrities into restaurants, their children’s schools, on vacations, and even their residential neighborhoods (Jones). By seeking out and publishing the whereabouts of celebrities, they cannot be sure who will find or come across that information. The paparazzi and media do not think of this before they publish. These people are unknowingly giving the public access to private information that could prove fatal if put in the wrong hands (Mandell). The public does not need that much information on celebrities’ lives.
A psychotherapist, Tina Tess, explains why people feel privy to celebrities’ private lives: “Actors play characters on TV that we feel like we know, and you feel like we know, and you feel privy to their private lives… We’ve all been encouraged to project our fantasy lives onto celebrities, so when a couple we identify with breaks up, it is slightly as if it is happening to us.” (Mandell). Since we feel emotionally and mentally connected with the celebrities it seems as if we have a need to know everything about what they are doing or where they are, when in reality we do not know them and we do not have the right to that information. The celebrities deserve privacy. The public and media are not allowing them to have any privacy.
The paparazzi should be respectful. They should not be allowed to encroach on an individual’s privacy in an effort to track down a celebrity. They should not be allowed on their victim’s private property or anyone’s private...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%